Monday, October 14, 2019

What I'm reading this week (10/14/19)

Last week I finished:

I haven't read a Judy Blume book since Are You There God? It's Me, Margaret in about fourth grade. I knew she had a couple of recent adult books, but I'd kind of forgotten about them until In the Unlikely Event came across my desk at work. My interest was piqued, and I started reading it right away. This is the story, based on actual events, of how three commercial plane crashes in Elizabeth, New Jersey, in the 1950s changed the lives of family, friends, and strangers. There are a lot of characters in this one (there's a helpful guide up front), and the action moves from person to person, though the narration remains third person omniscient throughout. I enjoyed this book immensely. It was my reading sweet spot. I love historical fiction with great characters, and this one had that in spades. The writing and plotting were swift, and it really kept me reading. I highly recommend this one to all. My rating: 5 stars.

I believe A Spool of Blue Thread is my third Anne Tyler read, and it's definitely my favorite. It has the quirky characters that Back When We Were Grownups (see my review here) and Clock Dance (see my review here) have, but it also has a depth of plot and characters that they lack. This is the story of the Whitshank family, present day and past; their oddities, quirks, and foibles; and their house, built by the patriarch's father. Several times, I thought ah, so this is what the book is about only to find as I kept listening that it was just a subplot. I'm not a fan of that kind of uncertainty in a book. But although I found the structure of the book a little sloppy, overall, I enjoyed listening to it a lot. Tyler does have a way with quirky characters, and while her books don't tend to be as serious as I generally prefer, I do find them fun. And I found this one even more fun than past reads. My rating: 4 stars.

The next three reviews are for books read for Cybils award judging and represent my opinions. My reviews do not necessarily reflect the opinions of other panelists.

My first middle-grade Cybils read was Never Caught, the Story of Ona Judge. This is the young reader's edition of Never Caught : The Washington's Relentless Pursuit of Their Runaway Slave, Ona Judge. In the late 1700s, one of George and Martha Washington's 200 slaves, Ona Judge, walked out of the president's home never to return. Although she was located living as a free woman in Philadelphia, she could not be persuaded to return, and nothing much was done to capture her and return her to the Washingtons. It's not quite the harrowing story I expected. I have major quibbles with this book. First, it would seem the only source document the author has to tell Ona's story is a newspaper article she was interviewed for in her later life. In it, she does not describe the escape or years since in detail, nor is she even able to tell which year it happened, only that she does not regret her choice even in light of the poverty she suffered as a free black woman. There are primary source documents in the form of letters sent to and from President Washington, to tell his side of the story. Which leads to my main quibble: there is much editorializing in this book. Due to its lack of material, it should have been written as a fiction book. Throughout, the author tells her readers again and again how evil slavery is, how wrong the Washingtons were, how mistreated slaves were, how immoral it was to buy and own slaves. (Who today doesn't agree?) It was so heavy-handed I cringed and so full of personal opinion it cannot honestly be called nonfiction. Unless, of course, the standards are lower for children's nonfiction, but I sincerely hope they aren't. This one falls into the category of books that commits the cardinal sin of historians: you cannot judge the past using the criteria of today. It's intellectually dishonest. A much more interesting take of this material for this grade level would have been the question Was Washington a bad man because he owned slaves or a good man in spite of owning slaves? Overall, although I was interested in the story, and I learned a few things I did not know about the years leading up to the Civil War, I found the writing mediocre and the nonadherence to the definition of nonfiction troublesome. My rating: 2.5 stars.

David Macaulay's Crossing on Time: Steam Engines, Fast Ships, and a Journey to the New World is a bonanza of information of the history of steam ships, how they work, and how they're built. Inspired by his own trip as a child crossing the Atlantic on the SS United States in the late 1950s, Macaulay examines the history of steam ships, explains the inner workings, and provides numerous drawings of ships from the 1800s to the mid-1900s. This history leads up to the ship that carried Macaulay and his family to America in 1957. There is a gigantic fold-out cross-section of the SS United States in the middle of the book, and boy is it something. I spent time pouring over it just like a little kid. It was fascinating. Although some of the more technical parts of the book (there's a lot of time spent on pistons and whatnot), were a little less interesting to me, I still think an older child (it's categorized on Amazon as being for grades 5-9) will be able to follow the descriptions. I found this one fascinating, and for a kid interested in ships, I think this book would be a hit. I was impressed. My rating: 4 stars.

I'm sure I haven't read a biography of Emily Dickinson since I was a kid, so I was excited to find Becoming Emily: The Life of Emily Dickinson on my list of Cybils reads. This book expertly takes us through Emily's life, describing her family, whom she was very close to all her life; her home; her school years; and her hermitlike ways as her desire to spend more and more time writing poetry deepened. By today's standards, her life was a small one. Added to the restrictions of the day on unmarried women, she often found herself homebound by her own illnesses and in caretaking for her parents and sister during their illnesses. I was interested to find she was a big fan of Jane Eyre and also the poet Elizabeth Barrett Browning. I was also fascinated to find that upon her death her sister hired her husband's mistress to prepare manuscripts of Dickinson's poems for publication (something Dickinson was never interested in during her life), but then a war broke out over the poems, some being kept by the family, and some by the mistress. It's stunning that the poems ever saw publication, all things considered. This book is categorized for grade level 5-7, but I would have thought it was for a much older audience (cover illustrations aside). I liked this one, and although it wasn't flashy (Emily, after all, wasn't flashy) I learned a lot. My rating: 4 stars.
 


Today I'll begin:
 

I'm kind of excited for this one.


My evening reads:
 
 

The poetry is sliding in order to get through as many children's books as possible before they're due back to the library. The decorating book is surprisingly slow going. And learning about wildebeests? Not so much my thing.


My current audiobook:
 


Only, what, 20 years late?

Monday, October 7, 2019

What I'm reading this week (10/7/19)

Last week I finished:

I'm always looking for a new mystery series, so I finally decided to try the first book in Millennium series by Stieg Larsson, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo. In this book, a journalist who is going to jail for libel is asked to solve the 30-some-year-old murder of a young heiress. What he discovers along the way is disturbing. I have to assume I am not the target audience for this one, although I am unsure who the target audience would be. This series is beloved by many, and perhaps the subsequent books are different, but I found this one too graphic and disturbing. It was also too long by at least a third. There is a secondary plot of international business fraud (or something) that I never did understand and just suffered through at the beginning and end of the book. It's smart writing, good plotting, and the characters, though rather unlovable, are well-drawn. I liked the mystery: how did a young woman disappear into thin air on an island that, at the time of her disappearance, was inaccessible to the outside world? I did not like the graphic sex scenes, the scenes of torture and sadomasochism, and the strong tendency of characters to exact revenge. It was all a little too dark and nasty for my enjoyment. If you like gritty crime stories, this will likely fill the bill for you, though. My rating: 3 stars. 

I cannot tell you the last time I asked a person for advice. I google things all the time to learn how to cook a pork tenderloin in the slow cooker or to double check the definition of sadomasochism (see above), but I'm not one to go in search of human advice. I believe the answers to our problems are within us, because we're all equal parts of divine intelligence--the only kind of intelligence there is. But I know there are a lot of folks who want other people to give them advice. Enter "Dear Sugar." Dear Sugar was (is?) an advice column written by Cheryl Strayed (author of Wild). And a collection of her columns was compiled into Tiny Beautiful Things. She practices what one might call "radical empathy." As someone who recently added a book titled Against Empathy to her TBR, I'm not sure I should have even picked this one up, but this has been on my list of books to read for so long, I decided to knock it off on audio. I know this book is something a lot of people love. I imagine it (and the advice column) has brought comfort and clarity to many. I appreciate that. I just found it disturbing on so many levels. I'll try to articulate that with compassion. Strayed seems to operate under the belief that we are all broken. While I understand this very popular view, I refuse to go through life believing I or anyone I meet is broken. If you look for brokenness, you'll find brokenness, and then you'll never see anything else. Get thee behind me, brokenness. I was also disturbed by the sheer number of people, especially twenty-somethings, but many mature people as well, were willing to give their power of decision-making and the direction of their lives over to a complete stranger. I was also disturbed in general by the kind of things people are sharing with that stranger. The book was full of sexual relationship issues, infidelity, unending grief and the ole gay vs. fundamentalist Christian trope. I found the book exhausting and the situations unbelievable. Sugar (Strayed) answered each question with a lengthy autobiographical essay peppered with terms of endearment (a favorite being "Sweet pea"). She's a master at having a story for every issue she addresses in a letter, and she's lived a lot of life and seen a lot of dis-ease, most of it hard, abusive, and addictive. Perhaps I'm not "broken" enough to appreciate this, but I tend to believe that you will live what you give into. Has my life been touched by infidelity, addiction, grief, alcoholism, poverty? Yes. Is it my choice to let those things own me, or take up residence in my head or heart, or be the undercurrents of my life story? Yes. Lastly, if you are a Christian, you will likely find a fair amount of this advice disturbing. She takes swipes at Christianity and, of course, Republicans (at one point she said she'd rather be sodomized by a lawn flamingo than vote for a Republican), so this book was only meant for half of the country's population. And it was definitely meant for a secular audience. It's not the advice I would have given, but it wasn't necessarily bad, either. (A note on the audio: It was narrated by Strayed, who read the questions and responses in a "poet's voice" [you know, the halting, emphatic voice young poets use when reading their work?], and when she got to her terms of endearment, they sounded faked and staged, like it was her schtick. I would have preferred a different narrator.) My rating: 3.5 stars.

Growing up, family dinner (we called it supper) was a nightly occurrence. We had no idea there were families who didn't eat together each night. What's more, it never really occurred to my brothers and me to have food preferences. There were a couple of things each of us didn't particularly care for, but we still ate it when it was served. Apparently, this is not the norm. Or at least it's not the norm nowadays. Jenny Rosenstrach, author of Dinner: A Love Story, which takes its name from her popular food blog, addresses family dinner head on, especially family dinner with young children. She believes in the nightly family dinner, but shoots for most family members eating mostly the same meal most nights. She also suggests feeding small children (babies and toddlers) their own dinners separate from the parents, which I find a little wacky for my Midwestern sensibilities, but then, we've established that my childhood family dinner experiences may not be average. She offers lots of ways to get children to try foods they say they don't like. One approach to family dining I find kind of genius (once I get past my "wait, who's the adult and why isn't she in charge?" headshaking), is the deconstructed meal, whereby your pasta-hating child can still have certain elements of the family meal while being allowed to ignore a"no-go" food like pasta or eggs or chicken. That way, at least the adult-who-is-in-charge can at least avoid having to make a different meal for each child. This is a re-read for me, and I really enjoy the book as a whole. There are a lot of straight-forward recipes that I have yet to try but really should. And the book, half memoir and half cookbook is beautifully written. I stopped following Rosenstrach's blog a number of years ago out of a frustration with her politics (what ever happened to no politics at the family table?) and her location blindness. She seems to have no awareness that there are folks out here who aren't living her same East Coast life. Still, the recipes are good. My rating: 4 stars.

I've found a new favorite book of poetry for the year. Marie Howe's The Kingdom of Ordinary Time, published in 2009, is one of my favorites of 2019. I've enjoyed her work for a long time (some books more than others), and this is a book very much like her What the Living Do, domestic and everyday, which is the kind of poetry I enjoy most. If you're looking for a short book of contemporary and approachable poetry that will surprise you more with its subtlety than its experimentation, give this one a try. My rating: 4 stars.  



This week I'll finish:
 

I've been taking my time with this one. I kind of don't want it to end.


My evening reads:
 

I have a lot of children's literature to read, so I'd better finish one or both of the poetry books this week.

My next audiobook:
 

I could go for a little Anne Tyler after a couple of heavy audios.



Wednesday, October 2, 2019

October 2019 reading list

October, November, and December are going to be interesting reading months here. I've agreed to be a judge for an online children's book award (more on that later), so I'm unsure how many "adult" books I'll be reading. I chose 14 books I plan to read, but the whole thing is subject to change.


Fiction 

 



Memoir & Nonfiction
 



Poetry
 
 
 
 
 

Tuesday, October 1, 2019

September 2019 wrap-up

September was another great month of varied and good reading. I had a lot of 4- and 5-star reviews. My favorites were The Sun Does Shine and Saints for All Occasions, but a couple of good re-reads made me very happy, too. I read a lot of books this month about identity, which I liked very much. Full reviews are linked to one-word reviews below.


4 stars

4 stars

3 stars

5 stars

4 stars

5 stars

4 stars

4 stars

5 stars
 
3.5 stars
 
3 stars
 
4.5 stars
 
3 stars
 
4 stars
 
4 stars

smart
4 stars

great
4 stars